Comments on: Miley Cyrus Photo—Art or Porn?

By: xsimplyxflyingx

xsimplyxflyingx — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:44:50 +0000

Oh my goodness. Just leave the poor girl alone. If she wasn’t famous no one would so much as question this picture. It’s very tastefully done. Do you see her chest? No. You see her back, her shoulders, and her arms. Half of the summery shirts in the world expose these things. A bikini shows more for crying out loud! Okay, and about these myspace pics..so what? There are younger girls showing so much more on their pages. We both know that no one would care less if she wasn’t a Disney star. She’s fifteen, and more so. she’s human. About the makeout session with her best friend..since when is it unnatural for a fifteen year old girl to explore. What’s so wrong about. Why should she have to watch every little thing she does? Because she has a show young people watch. Well first, if you don’t want your kids to be influenced by her, don’t let them watch her! End of story! Second, if you don’t want them to see all the ’sketchy’ but normal things she does, then it’s your job to do so. How dare people blame her for all this. Maybe you all should take a nice hard look at yourselves. If kids are behaving a certain way because they see it, maybe it’s your fault for letting them see it in the first place. Let the girl be herself. Let her show her bra, her stomach and her hips. She has an awesome bod. Why can’t she enjoy it while it lasts? She’s not like, a hooker or something. So what is she really doing wrong? Let her explore herself and her sexuality. She’s fifteen. It’s her right.

By: .nooneknows13

.nooneknows13 — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:57:46 +0000

Miley Cyrus is getting herself in a lot of headlines with her MySpace pictures these days.
She exposes her bra, tummy, hips, etc.. in a sexy way, and if you saw them, they’re anything but innocent.
And a supposed makeout session with her best friend and pictures to prove?
AND she’s laying with her stomach exposed on a couch with a guy next to her, obviously checking her out?
Yeah, I wouldn’t say she’s making much of an effort to keep her rep “squeaky clean”, because if she was, these racy pictures of her would quit popping up on the internet.
I really wonder what lectures she gets from her parents about those pictures…
Obviously, not serious enough.
One of these days she’s going to end up in a damned sex tape…

By: dixie girl

dixie girl — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:20:50 +0000

mily is allways doing things like this and shes gona get hurt one day for doing things like that and not only did she take that picture witch to me she looks like a porn star but she all so told 7teen that she wus pregnet and she rilly wusent and the fact that her parents let her take that picture its just a shame and to think i use to looke up to that person

By: pickenspitviper

pickenspitviper — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:54:33 +0000

In regards to the post by Asche, which part of it reads “it would be one thing if like 18+ were looking at her. but little children are looking at her. and also this is some what telling 15 year olds you need to look and act sexy to be normal.”

I think your opinion is wrong, because anyone 18+ looking at this could be considered a predator, or a child molester.

By: namida

namida — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:20:08 +0000

I think Miley kinda overdid it by taking pics like that. She’s only 15 and anyone with the right mind can tell that it’s kinda pornographic. Well, no nudity but still…I think a 15 year old should be left alone not exploited like some soft porn star.

By: Mz.VoLLeyBaLL

Mz.VoLLeyBaLL — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:32:03 +0000

What in the world????? This is a teenager for heavens sake. How many Disney channel stars do you see that are 15 that take pictures like that. Yeah in this case her parents were there on the photo shoot, but still her image potrays to these young girls. All the stuff in the stores her wigs, her outfits everything revolves around her to these little girls. She is too big for this to even happen. What’s next are you going to put this image on the front of a T-shirt in Wal-mart? Are these young girls going to think it’s okay to pose like this? I am so disapointed in the way her parents let her pose like this.But in the same sence it could be art.But you have to look at the way it potrays her. She seems so old in this picture like all it expresses is sex. But it was the choice of her parents and if her parents feel so comfortable with it then I guess it shouldn’t matter. But to me i feel she is too young. I’m fifteen also and about to turn sixteen and I wouldn’t feel comfortable poseing like that not for myself, my boyfriend, or anybody. It just shows too much of “Aren’t I sexy come and get me”. It’s just too grown up for her maybe in 3 to 4 years I might feel different about it, but she’s too young.

By: Asche

Asche — Thu, 08 May 2008 19:27:59 +0000

I really hate her kinda. well hate is a strong word to use, well highly dislike.
I work in elementary school type setting for a hour or 2 a day, and all those little girls have always been obsessed with hanamontana the tv character. I though it was cute they were running around happy, trying to act like her then I had to draw the line when 8 year olds were acting like they were 16 and rebelling against me, or in the kindergardern the little girls wanted the boys to date them or thats all they would talk about. I asked them if they were a little young. and said “well hanamontania likes boys” and I just dropped it.

most of the people that watch her are about ages 8 - 10 or 11 after that I notice the older kids are like… ya no she’s stupid. and I think that miley need to start singing by her real name not hana, and she needs to act a lot more responsible. little children are exposed to enough already, if they google hana and this comes up, there gonna think its normal and okay to be nude or other things, and she’s not being a good role model.

yes she dose look good in that picture, and I think it is artsy. I’m a artest and I think the photo is very nice. but I just think that she needs to remember who is looking at her and watching her. it would be one thing if like 18+ were looking at her. but little children are looking at her. and also this is some what telling 15 year olds you need to look and act sexy to be normal.

By: flaca_7

flaca_7 — Wed, 07 May 2008 14:40:07 +0000

I dont think there is naything wrong with this picture…..yes shes 15 and yes shes naked but she had a covers which are only showing her back…..and + her parents were on the set…….y does every one like to talk about people!!!

By: pivot

pivot — Mon, 05 May 2008 14:30:45 +0000

I agree with Monkey_Scout. While I don’t know if this is “art”, she can be compared to a portrait model from the 14 century. It is merely a photograph showing her back, shoulders, and arms, done in great taste and maturity.

I cannot fathom how any human being could be upset with this, given the fact that people have to willingly purchase the magazine in order to see the picture, and given that the human body is the most precious and graceful entity to make it to earth. And if people are still shocked and amazed that a 15 year old is posing for a photograph with nothing on her shoulders, and if their children happen to see the photograph, even with or without their permissions, perhaps teaching said children a thing or two… perhaps… talking to them… willingly showing them what is out there in the world… with a great explanation and discussion… so that the job as a parent can only get easier as time goes on. The news story here should be targeting said complainers rather than the model.

By: Monkey_Scout

Monkey_Scout — Sun, 04 May 2008 17:00:01 +0000

It’s because we are raised to fear the body in America. The human body is a beautiful thing, we shouldn’t be afraid to show it off. It’s our Puritan heritage that causes us to freak out and go, “Bad, bad!” What she done isn’t disgusting. What she done was pose for a photo. It’s not shocking. It’s art.