“Her period was two weeks late, and I never have waited so long for something. I was thinking, I'm not ready for a child.”
—David, New Jersey
Sex Education by Teens, for Teens!
6,447 current visitors
“Her period was two weeks late, and I never have waited so long for something. I was thinking, I'm not ready for a child.”
—David, New Jersey
Originally Published: Apr 1, 2004
Revised: Jan 26, 2007
Teens in the United States get pregnant, have abortions, and contract sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) at rates ranging from three to 74 times higher than teens in the Netherlands, France, and Germany.
The U.S. teen abortion rate, for example, is at least three times higher compared to these European countries, while the teen gonorrhea rate is more than 74 times higher than in the Netherlands and France, according to Advocates for Youth, a national organization that advances teen rights.

Photo by Mat Linek
Why the drastic difference? There are a lot of reasons. In the Netherlands, France, and Germany, adults treat teenagers with respect. They view them as contributing members of society, not problems to be solved.
Each of these European countries has an unwritten social contract with teenagers: "We'll respect your right to act responsibly, giving you the tools you need to avoid unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV," according to Advocates for Youth.
Do you feel treated that way? My guess is, no. Instead, U.S. adults hammer us with the message that we have to wait until we're married to have sex. They often make us feel guilty if we choose to have sex, even if we act responsibly. And that, ironically, makes us less likely to take steps to protect ourselves.
Many conservative politicians impose their own moral and religious beliefs on us, trying to force schools to teach abstinence-only sex education.
For some, abstinence might be the right choice. But it's not the right decision for everyone. That's why U.S. teenagers deserve the same comprehensive sexual education our European peers receive.
Another reason for Europe's lower teen pregnancy rates is the acceptance and availability of contraception. Teenage girls in Germany and the Netherlands use more oral contraceptives than U.S. girls.
"First, European teens are provided with national health insurance, which is universal and covers the cost," said Barbara Huberman, director of education and outreach at Advocates for Youth.
"Secondly, young woman are taught in school how to use the Pill. Last, but not least, instead of being taught to say 'no' to sex, women are supported in their prevention of unplanned pregnancy."
In Europe, teen contraception is so accepted that a commonly-used term is "double-dutch," which is when the guy wears a condom and the girl is on the Pill, says Huberman. This has contributed to the lower rates of teen pregnancies, abortions, and STDs.
The European focus, Huberman says, is on empowering young people to make an informed decision on whether they want to become sexually active. If they decide to, then they know it is expected they will always use protection against pregnancy and STDs.
The U.S. media are also to blame. Teenagers receive a lot of information—or misinformation—about sexuality from television, movies, and the Internet.
A popular teen show might depict a teen couple having casual sex, making it look like fun, but ignoring the possible consequences. Some teens feel pressure to copy what they see, as if this is the "norm."
One strategy would be for the government to launch a widespread, long-term media campaign to educate teenagers about protecting themselves against unplanned pregnancy and STDs.
Huberman says that the three European countries' governments support "massive, consistent, long-term public education campaigns."
The U.S. campaign could reinforce the idea that abstaining from sex is a good choice for many, but also advance the belief that teenagers have a duty—and a right—to protect themselves, should they decide to become sexually active.
MTV's Fight for Your Rights: Protect Yourself campaign is one of the few programs that provide honest information about sex to teens. But not all U.S. teens have access to MTV and the network only spends a limited amount of time on such programming.
U.S. policy-makers should re-evaluate the abstinence-only approach and realize it's time to provide quality, government-supported sexuality education. Research has shown that this approach works best.
"Research and science should guide policy, not individual or religious belief," Huberman says.
It is also absolutely crucial for our society to become more comfortable with sexuality. In the European countries mentioned, Huberman says, media campaigns are "far more direct and humorous than in the U.S. and focus on safety and pleasure."
What can you do about this? Get involved. Become an activist. If you attend a school with sex ed that is "too little, too late," demand your right to complete information and access to health services. If you want to change sex ed at your school, check out our Roadmap: A Teen Guide to Changing Your School's Sex Ed.
Small changes are happening. For example, the California Legislature recently approved a bill mandating comprehensive sexual education in the classroom. But much more needs to be done. You can help.
Huberman recommends logging onto the organization's Web site and joining a youth activist network, or becoming outspoken in your own service and community organizations.
Get active. Our future depends on it.
Sex Ed in the Bible Belt: Pathetic
Posted by: Svaldifari on May 18th, 2009 10:28pm
I agree one-hundred percent with all of these comments. I
believe that out parents and teachers have an obligation to
teach us how to protect ourselves rather than labeling us
"sinners" or what-have-you for not agreeing with them, or
persuing sexual relationships. They should've learned by now
that, let's see, when you tell a teenager not to do
something, what do they do? They do it.
I really think,
especially in the conservative South, that things need to
change... soon.
sex education just does not work
Posted by: b22 on Apr 7th, 2009 3:42pm
I had sex education in 6th grade and all it taught me was
what to expect from puberty. I had sex education again in
9th grade and it taught me that sex is a sin, and I would go
to hell if i didn't wait until marriage. Well i didn't wait
till marriage and i was told 3 months ago i have gonorrhea.
It has been a big deal in my life and I am angry with my
parents, and my teachers for not teaching me anything about
this. I know I would have waited because this is just not
worth it.
Yep
Posted by: Howyouuseit on Feb 13th, 2009 3:08pm
I've had no sex ed in-school since I was 11 (I'm now nearly
16), at 11 I was just told that I shouldn't do it while I
was young. My friends do it, I've had the chance to do it.
It's such a tabooed thing, and being a teenager in the UK is
like being some kind of disease, even as a mature teen,
people who don't even know me prejudge...
parents dnt understand
Posted by: mrsgirl22 on Dec 3rd, 2007 2:06am
I think the largest factor of teens having sexual problems
is because parents tell you its against the rules, but if
they were 2 tell us its our decision, more teens would be
more open with parents and adults allowing them to learn and
understand, parents need to know that teens will do somthing
they want 2 do, just saying no wnt stop us, they need to
encourage us us not to, but give reasons to why they say
that, but in the end they need to understand it is really
our decision
Sex Ed in the Bible Belt: Pathetic (cntd.)
Posted by: Svaldifari on May 18th, 2009 10:32pm
It's sad and disheartening to think that because of religion
or moral-based policy, that we have teens in this country
having to face a harsh reality with little to no
preparation. America (especially in the bible belt, and I
live just north of Atlanta, so I'd know) Seems to prefer a
policy of prohibition over a policy of teaching guidelines
and steps for safer sex. The government preferred to use
prohibiton with the 18th amendment too, and what happened?
Alcoholism rates went up. Shocking.